Eden Real Estate Group has now lodged an appeal against the refusal of their application to build 10 (but, we understand, ultimately 50) houses on land to the East of Lynsted Lane. The final decision will be made by the Government’s Planning Inspectorate, based on a review of written submissions. Lynsted with Kingsdown Parish Council has submitted one final letter of objection, which you can read HERE
One of our residents has analysed Imperial College modelling (for DEFRA) at postcode level along Greenstreet, the section of the A2 London Road that borders the parishes of Lynsted and Teynham.
The model shows all addresses be in exceedance of the World Health Organisation (WHO) limits for particulate matter and nitrogen dioxide (NO2).
Imperial College’s use of colour bands corresponds to the deciles in which our addresses fall when compared to the national picture. So purple means that we are in the worst polluted addresses in the country. Red takes you down one level of “deciles” into the second worst addresses on the national scale and so on.
Because of the topography along the London Road (single thoroughfare, increasing levels of traffic, complexity leading to congestion as people navigate junctions, parked cars, van deliveries, etc) we are suffering an increasingly harmful set of conditions. Made much worse where the historic pattern of development means most of these homes front directly onto the A2. Therefore, no mitigation is possible.
To explain how to interpret this data, take the first entry as an example: Claxfield Farmhouse, London Road ME9 9PX.
Pollutant one: PM2.5
At this address, the annual average of the pollutant PM2.5 is 10.68mcg/m3. The WHO limit is 5mcg/m3.
Nearly a fifth of strokes are attributed to exposure (for a year or more) of PM2.5 concentrations exceeding 10mcg/m3.
PM2.5 can also cause asthma, jeopardize lung functions and promote cancer.
Pollutant two: PM10
The reading for PM10 at this address is 17.56mcg/m3. The WHO limit is 15mcg/m3.
Cardiovascular mortality increases by 0.76% and respiratory mortality by 0.58% for every 10mcg/m3 increase of PM10.
PM10 can cause wheezing, bronchitis and reduce lung development.
Pollutant three: NO2
The reading for NO2 at this address is 13.01mcg/m3. The WHO limit is 10mcg/m3.
Long term exposure to even low levels of this toxic gas increases mortality rates and contributes to the development of asthma, and other respiratory issues.
See the analysis HERE
The Parish Council has responded to SBC’s consultation on air quality. The proposed action plan to 2028 includes more car clubs, more electric vehicle charging points and to better connect town centres in order to provide public transport, walking and cycling options. However, we believe the proposals are both unambitious and undeliverable.
We have an Air Quality Management Area (AQMA 5) in Lynsted/Teynham where three harmful pollutants already exceed the safe levels set by the World Health Organisation. Yet the Borough Council is suggesting the revocation of AQMA 5 - despite the fact they don’t even measure two of these pollutants. Particulate Matter can cause asthma and bronchitis, reduce lung development and promote cancer.
Our view is there should be a moratorium on all planning proposals between the Eastern side of Sittingbourne and Ospringe, in order to halt the increased numbers of vehicles causing pollution in our Parish.
You can read our response to the consultation
HERE
Our analysis of air pollution at post code level in the Parish can be viewed via this link:
If you wish to participate in the survey, the deadline is this Sunday (15th). You can find the survey here:
The grant we receive to help keep the streetlights on will be halved over the next two years - and then abolished completely - if Swale Council’s budget proposals are approved. Streetlights accounted for 47% of our budget this year. Without this grant, we might not be able to maintain them properly or, at worst, we’ll have to switch them off given the soaring price of electricity. This would have a serious impact on road safety at night in our Parish.
Sittingbourne News have covered the story today. Article
HERE
Quinn Estates have revised their two applications to build what is now a total of 8,400 new dwellings plus commercial space North and South of the A2.
The way the planning system works is that, even if you've already commented, you have to write in again. Otherwise it is assumed the re-submitted plans address any concerns you've raised.
Where you have commented previously, all you need to do is refer to your earlier correspondence. If nothing in the latest submissions makes you change your mind, you can simply state that you continue to object to - or support - these plans.
If you haven't expressed your views before, reading what other people have written can help frame your response.
You can log in to the planning website (as above) and submit your comments online, or send an email to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. - more information on how to have your say can be found here
If you wish to comment on both applications, you will need to write in twice - quoting the relevant reference number.
Below are the summary comments submitted by Lynsted with Kingsdown Parish Council on 22 December.
Highsted Park
Whilst we note the slight reduction in the number of residential dwellings, nothing in this revised documentation alters our fundamental objection to this sprawling destruction of best most versatile farmland. According to DEFRA, this area is classed as Grade 1 and we need to protect agricultural land for UK food production. Important landscapes that residents cherish must be preserved. The Government has made clear that brownfield development should be prioritised over greenfield. Swale Council must make the case on behalf of the Borough for fewer new houses to be built than currently planned, based on projected local population growth and infrastructure constraints. We do not need, nor can we accommodate, this volume of new housing which will have adverse environmental and ecological impacts. We already have a chronic shortage of GPs in Swale and the construction of buildings for medical facilities does not result in the recruitment of doctors and nurses. There are also major concerns about the additional strain on local water supplies, as well as drainage. We reiterate the objections raised in our letter dated 26 October 2021 and our position has not changed.
Land to the West of Teynham
This application would bring over 2,000 more vehicles to the area, but building new roads does not mitigate the problems of traffic congestion - they attract 40% more traffic before a single extra house is built. There are three Air Quality Management Areas (AQMAs) between Sittingbourne and Ospringe. Poor air quality can cause asthma and respiratory inflammation, as well as promoting cancers and affecting lung development in children. Existing pollution across the wider A2 area, but especially in the AQMAs, would be severely exacerbated by the applicant’s plans. The scale and location of this development would impact the farmlands and our ability to produce local food, as well as adversely affecting the historic setting and landscape of heritage assets. It would result in an amalgamation of Teynham and Tonge parishes with the settlement at Bapchild and the edge of the Sittingbourne developed area. This is in direct conflict with the designation of Important Local Countryside Gaps to avoid coalescence, in order to retain the character and identity of villages and rural settlements. We reiterate the objections raised in our letter dated 26 October 2021 and our position has not changed.